From a design perspective, Pi Network does not follow a proof of work model centered on computational competition. Instead, it attempts to build its network through the following approaches:

As a result, Pi Network places greater emphasis on early user scale and breadth of participation rather than on investment in raw computing resources. This positioning makes it closer to an experimental, mass market oriented blockchain network.
In early blockchain networks, mining typically required high performance hardware, continuous power consumption, and specialized technical maintenance. While this model helped secure the network, it also led to a high concentration of participation rights.
The “mobile mining” proposed by Pi Network is essentially a redefinition of what mining means. The background behind Pi Network includes several factors:
Ordinary users find it difficult to participate in traditional mining systems
Blockchain networks needed to rapidly build a user base in their early stages
Identity and social relationships began to be viewed as usable security signals
Within this framework, mobile mining does not perform computational competition. Instead, it functions as a participation mechanism based on user behavior and identity verification.
Pi Network is a highly controversial yet innovative cryptocurrency project. Its strengths are mainly reflected in its low entry threshold, low cost, and broad community base.
Extremely low barrier to entry: Pi’s mobile mining model completely removes the dependence on high performance hardware and large scale electricity consumption seen in traditional cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. Users only need to tap once a day in the mobile app to “mine,” allowing the general public with no technical background to participate easily.
Zero cost and low financial risk: Participating in Pi Network does not require users to purchase mining equipment or pay upfront fees. For users who want to explore the crypto space without risking principal losses, this provides a relatively friendly starting point.
Large global community base: To date, Pi Network has accumulated more than 45 million users. Such a broad consensus base is critical to the success of any crypto project and may help support future real world payment use cases and improve liquidity.
At the same time, Pi Network has clear limitations, including a lack of transparency in its mining mechanism, risks related to user data, and potential compliance concerns.
Prolonged development timeline: The mainnet launch was repeatedly delayed from the originally planned 2022 date until 2025. This prolonged uncertainty has tested community patience and raised doubts about the team’s ability to deliver.
Lack of transparency in the mining mechanism: Although the project claims to use the SCP protocol, details around core technologies such as the “security circle” algorithm and reward distribution logic remain insufficient, leading to questions about the true level of decentralization.
Privacy and KYC risks: Users must complete identity verification in order to transfer assets. Due to limited transparency around how personal data is handled, users face potential risks of identity information misuse or leakage.
Limited ecosystem use cases: At present, PI mainly circulates within the project’s internal ecosystem or among a small number of niche merchants, and has not entered mainstream consumer markets. Without support from the real economy, PI prices are highly susceptible to sharp fluctuations driven by speculation.
Controversial growth model: Because Pi Network heavily relies on an “invitation system” mechanism to increase mining speed, some legal and financial experts view it as having clear “pyramid scheme” style characteristics, raising compliance concerns.
Pi Network was founded by a group of highly skilled professionals from Stanford University, bringing strong academic and technical expertise to the project.
Core members of the Pi Network team include:
Dr. Nicolas Kokkalis: Nicolas Kokkalis holds a PhD in computer science from Stanford University and has extensive experience in distributed systems. He has been a key figure in the development of Pi Network.
Dr. Chengdiao Fan: Fan is an expert in social computing and human centered blockchain innovation, playing a critical role in shaping Pi Network’s vision and community engagement strategy.
Vincent McPhillip: A former co founder who made significant contributions to Pi Network’s early community growth and strategic direction.
PI is the native token of the Pi Network, used to incentivize participation, support internal value exchange, and enable potential application scenarios.
In terms of issuance, PI is not released all at once. Instead, it is gradually distributed as the network grows. Its main characteristics include:
Tokens are earned through user participation in the network
As the total number of users increases, the per user issuance rate gradually declines
Additional incentives are provided for node operation and security related behaviors
The core logic of this model is to use early incentives to build network scale, then gradually reduce new issuance in order to control long term inflation.
The value of PI does not directly stem from computational costs or energy consumption. Instead, it depends more on the development status of the network itself. Its potential value foundation mainly includes:
User scale and network effects A large user base is a prerequisite for transaction demand and application ecosystem formation.
Real world use cases Whether PI based payments, services, or applications actually exist is critical to realizing value.
Network security and stability The consensus mechanism and governance structure determine long term sustainability.
Market and community consensus Ultimately, token value depends on participants’ recognition of its functionality and future use.
Before a mature application ecosystem is established, PI’s value is largely reflected in expectations about network development.
The overall operating mechanism of Pi Network can be summarized as low barrier participation plus layered roles plus social verification.
PI’s mobile mining does not perform complex calculations. Its basic logic includes:
Users confirm active status through the mobile application
The system records participation behavior and allocates tokens
Allocation is independent of device performance
From a mechanical standpoint, this is closer to a participation incentive system than traditional mining.
Pi Network divides participants into multiple roles:
Regular users: Participate in the network and receive basic token incentives
Nodes: Run node software to assist with ledger maintenance and transaction verification
Trust circles: Social relationship networks created by users to assist with identity verification
The trust circle mechanism aims to reduce the risk of fake identity attacks through real world social relationships and is a key component of Pi Network’s security model.
PI mining and Bitcoin mining differ fundamentally in mechanism design, resource reliance, and security assumptions. Bitcoin uses a proof of work mechanism, making computing power and energy consumption the core foundation of network security. Pi Network, by contrast, weakens the role of computing power and instead relies on user identity, participation behavior, and social relationships to build its consensus environment.
| Comparison Dimension | PI Mining | Bitcoin Mining |
| Security Foundation | Identity and social verification | Computational power competition |
| Participation Threshold | Smartphone | Specialized mining hardware |
| Energy Consumption | Extremely low | High |
| Incentive Logic | Behavioral participation | Hash computation |
| Decentralization Path | Driven by user scale | Driven by hash power distribution |
These two models represent different technical tradeoffs under different development goals. The former emphasizes censorship resistance and security certainty, while the latter focuses more on accessibility and user scale expansion. The resulting differences are reflected not only in mining methods, but also in decentralization paths, participation thresholds, and long term network structure.
On the Gate platform, users can view basic information and market data related to PI through market or asset pages, including price trends, trading pairs, and volume. This information helps users understand PI’s circulation status and trading activity in secondary markets.
For users with the appropriate permissions, Gate provides PI related trading markets that support buying and selling under defined rules. Specific trading methods, available pairs, and operational procedures are subject to the platform’s current interface and usage guidelines.
Before engaging in any transactions, understanding trading mechanisms, fee structures, and asset risk management principles can help users participate more rationally in crypto markets. Gate also provides tutorials and rule explanations to help users better understand trading processes and important considerations.
Through mobile participation, social trust, and layered role design, Pi Network explores a development path that differs from traditional computing power based mining. The value foundation of PI relies more on network scale, application ecosystems, and long term consensus formation rather than on energy or hardware input. The project provides a reference case for understanding the diverse forms blockchain may take as it moves toward mass adoption.
Is Pi Network a blockchain network?
Pi Network adopts blockchain related ledger and consensus design concepts, but its security model and participation methods differ from traditional blockchain networks centered on computational competition.
Is PI “mobile mining” equivalent to traditional mining?
No. PI mobile mining does not involve intensive computation. It is closer to an incentive mechanism based on user behavior, identity verification, and network participation.
What is the total supply of PI?
According to Pi Network’s publicly disclosed economic model, the designed maximum total supply of PI is approximately 100 billion tokens.
What role does the trust circle play in Pi Network?
The trust circle introduces social relationships as a supplementary identity verification mechanism, aiming to reduce the impact of fake accounts and Sybil attacks on network security.
What factors mainly determine the value of PI?
PI’s value mainly depends on user scale, real world use cases, network security, and overall consensus among participants regarding its functionality.
Does Pi Network directly compete with traditional public blockchains such as Bitcoin?
The two differ significantly in design goals and technical paths, and are better viewed as blockchain solution explorations addressing different problem contexts.





